Evil (STS) is the EFFECT of STUPIDITY

Ignorance is lacking information. Stupidity increases with the willingness to take great negative action against others based on lacking information.  STS: a natural phase in the journey of individuation ?

In this article I intend to show that STO beings have a greater degree of consciousness development than STS beings. In the realm of gang stalking (for you TIs out there) this means that even the knowing and most conscious leaders who control their stalker pawns through indoctrination are less developed than targets who are aware of the mechanics involved and are working on their own internal understanding.

First let’s recover some basic definitions. STO beings ‘serve others’ and STS beings ‘serve themselves’. In the truest sense each of these polarities serve themselves and the Whole (the universe, the All). Whether through serving self or others, all beings serve the Infinite Consciousness in helping it to know itself and this in turn provides greater opportunities for the All to develop yet newer and increasingly diverse expressions of Consciousness.

Though in this world the difference between STO and STS tends to mean the difference between those who consider the wellbeing of others and those who only consider the wellbeing of themselves, the point I wish to make is that beings with a chosen STO stance are better serving themselves than STS beings. I wish to establish that STO beings better serve themselves because such self-discovery is in relation to the Whole, where STS self-discovery is not done with conscious considering of the Whole (or greater good).

Making Sense of the World

In making sense of the world we have internal and external influences to consider. The difference between STO and STS entities in this regard are that STO beings have a greater understanding of how to process external influences using their internal faculties of intuition and general self awareness. This is an internal sense making. Simply, those who are aware of a larger ecosystem make better decisions about how they fit into the Whole. As such those beings who take into consideration the wellbeing of those with whom they interact ensure that they themselves are working in congruence with the Whole. As such their usefulness to the Whole will not diminish; STO beings will continue to develop infinitely. I believe that STS beings eventually come to a similar realization and adopt STO-like stances. (As mentioned in other articles on the topic of STO and STS, these distinctions do not seem to appear as such separate poles among much more developed beings and frequencies of being). From the perspective of a relatively more developed being, making decisions based on self-interest AND group interest is the most rational route. In dealing with relatively less developed beings, the more developed being balks at the seeming lacking rationality of the other ‘player’, yet naturally we’re each doing our best with the knowledge and understanding we’ve gathered to-date.

To clarify, decidedly STO beings consider external influences and work to fit these pieces into their internal model -of the world and themselves. Decidedly STS beings consider external influences yet lack personal development that allows for a solid internal model of the world and themselves. As such, STS beings see external influences as warring opinions with sides to be chosen and used to protect themselves and their limited perspective of Self,  rather than to see external influence as neutral information that can be used to further development.

Of course internal models are also affected by external influence, the key is that by building a connection to our inner modeling we can be fluid, resilient beings able to change and consider new information. Decidedly STS humans seem to have trouble considering alternative perspective and tend to try to control these through waging war on dissimilar perspectives rather than simply taking in what makes sense and leaving the rest alone. They have trouble seeing that there is enough room for a lot of people to be correct in a lot of different ways.

A self-consistent model is a sane model

As a teenager (the time when most of us are bombarded with all manner of external influence and information) I came to the conclusion that it was important to buffer my self from external input for a period of time while I established some basic definitions/truths, before going on to consider all the rich and abundant sources of information and perspective. After all, what sense would it make to me to simply take in random bits of info and judge their meaning according to other random bits of info? So while I was going to high school I did the school work, but focused more on my own philosophical explorations to establish a sort of basic Self and set of truths from which to judge the things I would go on to encounter. During this time I met like-minded people into philosophy who would offer up suggestions like “oh, you’ve got to read Decartes, what you say sounds just like what he said”, etc. These philosophers’ works interested me, but again, I could not see the point of consulting someone else’s work at establishing a basic Self rather than using my own. After all, every one of us is a microcosm  complete with the same functions of reasoning found in the influences that helped to create all of reality. Eventually I did go on to take in and consider such perspectives, but doing my own work at learning to discern meaning (truth) from incoming information was critical because I had a basic model in which to fit every bit of new information I took in. Rather than coming in pell-mell and building a cacophonous model of somewhat meaningless information, I was building a self-consistent model of mind and system for processing information.

What about later information that refutes the basic ‘established’ truths? Well, there weren’t any. The basic truths that established my self-consistent model were empirical, that is they were based on observation, experience and experiment. As such I deemed these to be truth that I could use to understand the less-clear (new) experiences that came my way. I did not decide the meaningfulness of mundane things like if this or that perspective was correct, but kept to basic questions and hypotheses having to do with the nature of reality and my existence within reality. The relationship between Self and Higher Self (that is, our internal sense of knowing and intuition) tends to go through various phases of discovery, yet the basic relationship does not change; the self is always connected to the greater Whole; each individual is a unique ray of the Whole, with its origin in the very center of the All. In this way of utilizing our connection to the Whole when considering external influences, I believe an understanding of an STO way of moving in the world is discovered. The parts we encounter are always shifting. We’re always taking in new information and additional perspectives offered by others, yet the constant is seeing our place within the larger Whole. By considering what each new piece of information means to the Self we are considering new pieces while consulting this constant: our relationship with the Whole.

Relationship to the Whole / being created in the image of the Creator

Most of us are familiar with the concept of being unique individuals endowed with all the functions of reasoning that the Creator itself has. In Christianity, for example, this is expressed as our each being created in the image of God. We each have this connection to the Infinite Consciousness (god, if you prefer). We are each unique beings who have the ability to consult this inner connection when considering new information. It is an inner connection because the Infinite Consciousness develops through Diversification; we are each rays of creation, originating in Source. Along the ‘ray of creation’ various concentric layers are encountered. Each of these layers of reality has its own laws and limits. For this reason, we are seemingly separated from Source (God) by these external limits. Yet every being that is created has impressions of Source and these channels of communication are internal in the way we perceive reality as human beings.

When it comes to power mongers in government, gang stalking or smaller instances offered by friends and family members (who tend to be sane usually ;P), the missing piece that makes such beings or behavior decidedly STS is that they are not comparing/contrasting new information against their own internal model; they do not sense their internal connection to the Whole and therefore do not understand how to utilize intuition and their internal sense of knowing. Rather, STS beings see the insanity of the warring perspectives they encounter in the world and decide the best they can do is grab hold of some more-popular opinions, so they use these to can gather as much consensus power as possible. This is the way that STS tries to seek survival and continued existence. This is not sharing-of-perspective, but attaching and armoring oneself with memes/ideas. Thus identity for these beings is defined by ideology, not consciousness and personal experience –it becomes a war of ideas, rather than a sharing of ideas. This is the flaw in mistaking ideology for identity; ideas are means, not ends. There are no ‘ends’; all is learning…but back to the self-interest / group interest angle:  The problem is that by sucking energy from others through indoctrination (influencing in others a limited perspective of reality // ideology as law), such beings are not working for the Whole -(beyond what they can discover about themselves- before running out of energy). So where a decidedly STS being starts out on an arguably valid path of seeking to understand themselves through controlling their reactions to external influences // valuing ideas based on their potential to fascinate others, this in turn leads to controlling others who do not choose to engage their own free will (which would make manipulations like indoctrination transparent). This is a type of reductionism that isolates the STS being. This is a negative feedback loop that brings an STS being more power over others, but no real understanding of themselves and their place in the ecosystem which is even larger than the frequency they resonate with and larger than the pool of people they are able to manipulate.

Put simply, as STS beings suck energy/power from those they are able to manipulate, all this breeds is a hunger for more power; entropy. If it were possible, such beings would seemingly suck energy and indoctrinate the entire world into seeing things their way (not that they have a unique perspective to offer, the indoctrination of STS types means seeing the world as a dog-eat-dog power war). Of course this is not possible, yet this gives some idea of the desperate sort of black hole such beings feel to be their position in life: to these beings it seems that only further domination and the taking of power will ensure their continued existence.

STS encounters with more powerful STS beings

When decidedly STS types of beings encounter another being who appears to be possibly stronger than they are, like a wild animal, they do not try to understand the stronger being in a larger sense, but seek only to take it down because in the STS way of looking at things challenges to their power should be tested. “perhaps they have more attractive ideas that can fascinate even more people”– is about as far as rational thought goes in such cases. If the challenging being is of STS orientation then the two beings battle and work out the pecking order –the STS character we’ve been talking about either falls in line with the more powerful STS being as a kind of disciple or mere pawn, or if they determine that they themselves are more powerful, will do their best to put the other being in its place.

STS encounters with an STO being

When the being the STS sees as challenging is an STO type, the war agenda from the STS being who feels threatened can go on for long periods of time because these beings are not playing the same game. It’s apples and oranges. Wherever the STS being finds yet greater cunning attacks and maneuvers, he is never satisfied because the STO being does not move in those ways and will proclaim neither domination nor submission. The STO being, though it may be depressed (emotionally or in basic energetic terms until they discern the nature and source of attacks) for some time, is ultimately not affected in any STS way. Essentially, the stronger STO being learns even more about their place in the larger Whole. The learned pieces, as usual, are fit into the STO being’s model; that is, STO beings work at maintaining an internal sense of things; they are capable in interested in introjecting phenomena as well as whatever they may project onto external reality. As such, this deeper understanding of reality co-creation means that STO beings share perspective rather than bludgeon others with it.

As an aside, I’ve experienced realization that I’m interacting with a potentially less developed being of ‘undecided’ stance when my sharing of perspective is construed as indoctrination. How do I know it’s *not* truly indoctrination? Well, personal intent goes a long way, yet the other party can not see my intent except through longer term behavior. If the other person can look at a record of interactions and see things like my willingness and interest in hearing other perspectives; if I show joy in the act of sharing and discussion in general, these are signs that my agenda is sharing, not indoctrination. Such assessments are, naturally, up to the individual.

If STO beings develop infinitely, what happens to STS beings?

Some explorations of the two paths allude to the idea that STS beings eventually reduce themselves out of existence. The logic behind these explorations seems sound enough, yet only reaches somewhat further than the most mundane physical understanding of reality. Such logic goes like this: STO and STS beings both develop consciousness along their respective paths, yet where STO develops Beingness, STS develops Awareness at the cost of Beingness. Essentially, STS beings become less ‘real’ or manifest in the usual sense, and become dark aspects of the unconscious side of the Whole. It is theorized that such unBeingness is what accounts for darker influences coming to us through the etheric or subconscious layers of self. This is all very interesting, and I think there is truth to the metaphysics, yet I do not think that more developed STS beings are sitting somewhere purposely trying to influence humankind through our dreams and thoughts (the devil whispering in our ear, as it were). I think the echoes of such beings are responsible for these darker influences, just as our own darker side contributes to the layer of daker influences which challenge us all.

So where do they go? I think that more developed STS beings, if pushed to the extremes of: seeing a more STO approach or popping out of existence, essentially get further opportunities to try out what they’ve learned in conditions (limits) similar to this earthly realm. It’s also been theorized that as STS beings develop in consciousness they become less manifest and eventually do sort of pop out of existence, becoming the very stuff (atoms) that physical reality is made up of. For what it’s worth I believe that STS is a step to STO. Not that every most rational STO type has walked the STS path (though that may be accurate for many), but that STS eventually becomes what we humans would consider to be STO –in their rationality// eventually everyone learns the laws of this realm and the shifting required to exist manifestly in and beyond.

I do not believe that anyone is ‘left behind’. I believe that everyone continues to develop. I think it’s possible that having free will means we are even capable of deciding to discontinue personal development. The Whole is timeless and so there is infinite space and time in which beings can develop and sometimes even take time out from development.

In my experiences and analysis, it seems possible (if not likely) that the entire progression through STS development is but one phase of development in a grander scheme of things. Is it possible that after one gathers consciousness and then is cycled back through to physical reality that they then go on to tackle STO perspectives and how to develop self while working on congruence with a larger group / the whole?

Personal Meaning for me and this exploration

Living with continued attacks and attempt at infiltration of my personal space has made understanding of these topics important for me personally. Though at the beginning of the attacks I sensed the desperation and greed of the STS leader types, I really could not understand their perspective. After all, it’s hard to see the limits of another perspective when your own does not have such limits. To me it is clearly limiting to see others only as potential enemies or pawns to control in the seeking of more power. To me this is obviously entropic and will only lead to more suffering, for myself and others.

What I’ve come to understand more recently is a clearer snapshot of what such limits look like from within an STS perspective, how such limited perspectives tend to color the world. I’ve learned that perhaps the most viable lessons -lessons able to offer alternatives to the more developed STS perspective and the problematic limitations- are those lessons gained through encounters with decidedly STO beings. I kept wondering at what seemed to me to be repeated responses of acceptance from myself –I got tired of showing the same response to someone who only seems to see such responses as weak, yet somehow I know that is the best I can do for myself and for the attacker. Perhaps this is the Bodhisattva requirement (leaving a clue/path as to freedom from the limits when they are outgrown, but also the piece that completes graduation –in my internal shorthand translated to english words, anyway–) where we see the full cycle of earlier steps and are tested to see how much we can truly remember of our many lessons along the way ; a threshold.

A tangent about processing negative emotions

At some points the STS leader type attacking me through the various pawns would have them taunt me with messages about how they’ve seen me get angry about their attacks, as if this were some sign that I’d conceded and accepted an STS stance. Apparently this is one level of processing the STS leader is going through: understanding the processing of strong emotion. My explanation is as follows. Everyone experiences positive and negative emotions. Processing these emotions in a conscious way (rather than ignoring them) makes the emotions catalyst for development. An STS type turns emotions into catalyst by consciously controlling their negative emotions, shoving them deep into their mind, to bring them out later in controlled applications of… control –they hatch their devious plans to control the situation and the target. STO types also work to consciously process their emotions. Both types work at intensifying the emotion in order to fully consider and confront it. Where the STO method differs is that they accept the emotion rather than control it. Just because a target becomes angry does not mean that they are falling toward STS control or control of others, it means they are alive and have reasonable reactions to being persecuted. Again, the difference is that I consider my anger to be something worth working to accept and understand.

</end tangent>

In closing, I offer these perspectives to other targets who are working at understanding why there seems to be someone or some group soooo interested in them. Perhaps the answer is because you have something they can learn from, yet it seems the only way they can learn at this point is to constantly attack and try to bring you down, as is the way within STS hierarchies. Stay strong and work on your inner models and personal development. You are learning about yourself and hopefully the attackers can learn something useful for their own development, but of course that is up to each of them. This is the best we can do.